Render Target: SSR
Render Timestamp: 2024-10-24T19:45:18.309Z
Commit: 56767fe525c928647c8401233a175d0d607d385d
XML generation date: 2024-07-25 13:14:08.148
Product last modified at: 2024-10-18T06:00:10.179Z
1% for the planet logo
PDP - Template Name: Monoclonal Antibody
PDP - Template ID: *******c5e4b77

p53 (1C12) Mouse mAb #2524

Filter:
  • WB
  • IP
  • IF
  • F
  • ChIP

    Supporting Data

    REACTIVITY H M R Hm Mk
    SENSITIVITY Endogenous
    MW (kDa) 53
    Source/Isotype Mouse IgG1
    Application Key:
    • WB-Western Blotting 
    • IP-Immunoprecipitation 
    • IF-Immunofluorescence 
    • F-Flow Cytometry 
    • ChIP-Chromatin Immunoprecipitation 
    Species Cross-Reactivity Key:
    • H-Human 
    • M-Mouse 
    • R-Rat 
    • Hm-Hamster 
    • Mk-Monkey 

    Product Information

    Product Usage Information

    For optimal ChIP results, use 2.5 μl of antibody and 10 μg of chromatin (approximately 4 x 106 cells) per IP. This antibody has been validated using SimpleChIP® Enzymatic Chromatin IP Kits.

    Application Dilution
    Western Blotting 1:1000
    Immunoprecipitation 1:500
    Immunofluorescence (Immunocytochemistry) 1:3200 - 1:12800
    Flow Cytometry (Fixed/Permeabilized) 1:800 - 1:3200
    Chromatin IP 1:200

    Storage

    Supplied in 10 mM sodium HEPES (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 100 µg/ml BSA, 50% glycerol and less than 0.02% sodium azide. Store at –20°C. Do not aliquot the antibody.

    For a carrier free (BSA and azide free) version of this product see product #15755.

    Protocol

    Specificity / Sensitivity

    p53 (1C12) Mouse mAb detects endogenous levels of total p53 protein.

    Species Reactivity:

    Human, Mouse, Rat, Hamster, Monkey

    The antigen sequence used to produce this antibody shares 100% sequence homology with the species listed here, but reactivity has not been tested or confirmed to work by CST. Use of this product with these species is not covered under our Product Performance Guarantee.

    Species predicted to react based on 100% sequence homology:

    Rabbit

    Source / Purification

    Monoclonal antibody is produced by immunizing animals with a synthetic peptide corresponding to residues surrounding Ser20 of human p53.

    Background

    The p53 tumor suppressor protein plays a major role in cellular response to DNA damage and other genomic aberrations. Activation of p53 can lead to either cell cycle arrest and DNA repair or apoptosis (1). p53 is phosphorylated at multiple sites in vivo and by several different protein kinases in vitro (2,3). DNA damage induces phosphorylation of p53 at Ser15 and Ser20 and leads to a reduced interaction between p53 and its negative regulator, the oncoprotein MDM2 (4). MDM2 inhibits p53 accumulation by targeting it for ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation (5,6). p53 can be phosphorylated by ATM, ATR, and DNA-PK at Ser15 and Ser37. Phosphorylation impairs the ability of MDM2 to bind p53, promoting both the accumulation and activation of p53 in response to DNA damage (4,7). Chk2 and Chk1 can phosphorylate p53 at Ser20, enhancing its tetramerization, stability, and activity (8,9). p53 is phosphorylated at Ser392 in vivo (10,11) and by CAK in vitro (11). Phosphorylation of p53 at Ser392 is increased in human tumors (12) and has been reported to influence the growth suppressor function, DNA binding, and transcriptional activation of p53 (10,13,14). p53 is phosphorylated at Ser6 and Ser9 by CK1δ and CK1ε both in vitro and in vivo (13,15). Phosphorylation of p53 at Ser46 regulates the ability of p53 to induce apoptosis (16). Acetylation of p53 is mediated by p300 and CBP acetyltransferases. Inhibition of deacetylation suppressing MDM2 from recruiting HDAC1 complex by p19 (ARF) stabilizes p53. Acetylation appears to play a positive role in the accumulation of p53 protein in stress response (17). Following DNA damage, human p53 becomes acetylated at Lys382 (Lys379 in mouse) in vivo to enhance p53-DNA binding (18). Deacetylation of p53 occurs through interaction with the SIRT1 protein, a deacetylase that may be involved in cellular aging and the DNA damage response (19).
    1. Levine, A.J. (1997) Cell 88, 323-31.
    2. Meek, D.W. (1994) Semin Cancer Biol 5, 203-10.
    3. Milczarek, G.J. et al. (1997) Life Sci 60, 1-11.
    4. Shieh, S.Y. et al. (1997) Cell 91, 325-34.
    5. Chehab, N.H. et al. (1999) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96, 13777-82.
    6. Honda, R. et al. (1997) FEBS Lett 420, 25-7.
    7. Tibbetts, R.S. et al. (1999) Genes Dev 13, 152-7.
    8. Shieh, S.Y. et al. (1999) EMBO J 18, 1815-23.
    9. Hirao, A. et al. (2000) Science 287, 1824-7.
    10. Hao, M. et al. (1996) J Biol Chem 271, 29380-5.
    11. Lu, H. et al. (1997) Mol Cell Biol 17, 5923-34.
    12. Ullrich, S.J. et al. (1993) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90, 5954-8.
    13. Kohn, K.W. (1999) Mol Biol Cell 10, 2703-34.
    14. Lohrum, M. and Scheidtmann, K.H. (1996) Oncogene 13, 2527-39.
    15. Knippschild, U. et al. (1997) Oncogene 15, 1727-36.
    16. Oda, K. et al. (2000) Cell 102, 849-62.
    17. Ito, A. et al. (2001) EMBO J 20, 1331-40.
    18. Sakaguchi, K. et al. (1998) Genes Dev 12, 2831-41.
    19. Solomon, J.M. et al. (2006) Mol Cell Biol 26, 28-38.
    For Research Use Only. Not For Use In Diagnostic Procedures.
    Cell Signaling Technology is a trademark of Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.
    All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Visit our Trademark Information page.